All in the Family: The Making of Town Diary - The Trouble With Sluttish Eroticism

"Some people have been unkind. If I say I want to grow as an actress, they look at my figure. If I say I want to develop, to learn my craft, they laugh. Somehow they don't expect me to be serious about my work."
-Marilyn Monroe

Actresses often find that they're damned if they are and they're damned if they aren't - sexy, that is.

Marilyn may be an obvious case of an actress who kept striving to be taken seriously for her work, only to have it all boil down to her looks.  She was, however, neither the first nor the last actress to be "too sexy" to be taken seriously.

One notorious example of this was with none other than (now) Dame Helen Mirren, who faced this problem even as she was a featured actress on the London stage doing "serious" work, including Shakespeare and other classics,  with directors like Peter Brook and Trever Nunn.

In the interview below, Michael Parkinson, a famed BBC interviewer for many years, opens the segment by repeating a review that said Mirren was "telling at projecting sluttish eroticism." When Mirren comes out with a headpiece that she turns into a not-so-subtle phallic prop, she proceeds to turn the table on Parkinson. When he presses her on whether it makes it harder to be an actress when others focus on her "physical attributes," she coyly acts as if she isn't sure what he means.

"Physical attributes? Like my fingers?"

She finally gets him to be as specific as he will be, referring to her "figure." The interview has taken on the stuff of lore. If you've never seen it, watch a truly masterful performance below. (Note that in the shot below, Parkinson's eyes are definitely not on future Dame Mirren's eyes.)

This dilemma is one reason I always gave Charlize Theron credit for taking the role of the unattractive serial killer Aileen Wuornos in Monster early in her career. She was taking no chances of playing someone's love interest and arm candy forever. Winning a Golden Globe and an Oscar didn't hurt, either.

The misogyny and hypocrisy that surrounded the hiring of women in front of (and behind) the camera had always annoyed me. Men wanted to cast sensual women, but then seemed to blame the women for being to sexy. In both theater and film, I fought to get past this out-dated silliness, so you can imagine how annoying I found it with when it came from my director, Jack. In the year 2000, Jack was still arguing that we could not cast an actress that was 'too sexy' to play Brian's associate and assistant producer, Veronica.

I thought it essential that there be some level of sexual tension between the two characters. It didn't have to end with the two of them in the sack - in fact, I don't think that would have worked - but at some point, it would not be unusual for two people working closely together to form an attraction, whether or not they acted on it.

Jack was insistent that this would never happen, because of sexual harassment laws and because 'workplace romances never work out.' His logic flew in the face of the endless examples in every workplace of people who started out as co-workers and ended as romantic partners.

Jack rejected one attractive actress after another, insisting that he did not want there to be any suggestion that there was anything between the two. Among the women he rejected outright was Sofia Vergara, who was submitted to us. I know what you're thinking. Bad example for my case, as she plays mostly a sexpot on Modern Family. If you had seen her acting reel, you would have seen a lot of good work that went well beyond her "physical attributes."

As luck would have it, we wound up casting an athletic, natural beauty named Brette.

As attractive as Brette is, I think something about her almost her earthy demeanor was less threatening to Jack than actresses that came off softer.

Brette was a real find, and I will give Jack credit where it is due - had we stopped at some of the other actresses, we would not have wound up at Brette (who turned out to be a neighbor of mine at the time). Not only have I never regretted that we cast her, I always saw this as one of those times when two people with starkly different opinions on a project can bring about a better result if they are willing to keep working at it honestly.

Both my casting director and my assistant were thrilled with Brette as well.

I wish this had a happier ending.

Having cast a woman who had charm, beauty and depth, it would have made an attraction even more natural and powerful. However, two things stopped that from happening.

First, Jack kept making it clear that he wanted no suggestion of an attraction on either of their parts. This infuriated me; I had clearly written them with an attraction in mind, and David, who played Brian, thought it made sense as well.

Here was the second problem. David's personality had a negative effect on a lot of people, and Brette had the same aversion to him as a person that my friend Annie found. She was a professional, and it she never let it show in her performance, but any spark between them on screen was dampened before it ever had a chance.

Having cast the two leads, the issue of attractive women came up in the last role we cast, that of the 2nd wife of the retired sheriff (played by Terry Quinn). The idea was that she was much younger and had worked for him, with the suggestion that there was something unsavory about it.

We both thought she should be Hispanic. Jack was more willing to lean to someone more sexy here, but when it came to defining that, Jack and I were not on the same page. It seemed the stress from the compromise each of us felt on casting Veronica spilled over into casting the young wife. Anyone one of us liked, the other one disliked. It's one of those things that has always been hard for me to understand, but, I don't think either of us were rejecting the other's choices intentionally, or certainly not spitefully.

The role of the young wife became a place where, having agreed she could have more on-screen 'heat,' now, it would be a matter of how much. It is possible Jack is one of those male directors who is just not comfortable with working with that side of the male/female connection. Frankly, I always felt that most of Martin Scorsese's early films had this problem, and thought maybe there was some side of Scorsese's Roman Catholic upbringing that allowed him to show women as either Madonnas (not the singer) or Temptresses, and the lack of any real love scenes was interesting.

There was no Catholic guilt that I could detect from Jack, even though he was Irish-Catholic. He had a normal and healthy sex life. I just think he had trouble with bringing that out on screen, directing an actress to express that side of her.

We went through an amazing number of women for a role that had less than a handful of lines. Our casting director and my assistant Christine were past the point of rolled eyes. Jack actually suggested Vergara for this role; we all quickly pointed out that while her people submitted her for a female lead, they never would have considered her for such a small role.

I don't think we ever agreed on anyone, but we did eventually settle on someone neither of us hated (but neither of us were exited about, either).

With casting done, we had just a few more things to settle in pre-production before moving on to filming. In the next few posts, the difficulty with location managers, dealing with the recurrence of an illness for JR, and more on the down side of working with "family."


UPDATE: An interesting note. Brette will be appearing in TWO TV series this fall - As Batman's mother in "Gotham" and as a Luke's new back-up singer and muse on "Nashville." Good to hear.